Define Books As A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia
| Original Title: | Mil plateaux (capitalisme et schizophrénie) |
| ISBN: | 0816614024 (ISBN13: 9780816614028) |
| Edition Language: | English |
Gilles Deleuze
Paperback | Pages: 632 pages Rating: 4.3 | 5317 Users | 214 Reviews
Narrative In Favor Of Books A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia
Gilles Deleuze (1925-1995) was Professor of Philosophy at the University of Paris VIII. He is a key figure in poststructuralism, and one of the most influential philosophers of the twentieth century. Felix Guattari (1930-1992) was a psychoanalyst at the la Borde Clinic, as well as being a major social theorist and radical activist. A Thousand Plateaus is part of Deleuze and Guattari's landmark philosophical project, Capitalism and Schizophrenia - a project that still sets the terms of contemporary philosophical debate. A Thousand Plateaus provides a compelling analysis of social phenomena and offers fresh alternatives for thinking about philosophy and culture. Its radical perspective provides a toolbox for nomadic thought and has had a galvanizing influence on today's anti-capitalist movement. Translated by Brian Massumi
Present Containing Books A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia
| Title | : | A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia |
| Author | : | Gilles Deleuze |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Special Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 632 pages |
| Published | : | 1987 by University of Minnesota Press |
| Categories | : | Philosophy. Theory. Nonfiction. Politics. Academic |
Rating Containing Books A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia
Ratings: 4.3 From 5317 Users | 214 ReviewsEvaluate Containing Books A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia
Holy smokes. This is probably one of the most interesting books ever written. It is however very confusing for people who are not familiar with the jargon. It will literally change how you look at the world. The West has embraced a tree-like structure of order and understanding whereas the East has embraced a more rhizomatic understanding. And that's what this book focuses on. The concept of rhizomatic maps. This dichotomy is also the reason why Eastern philosophy is so very different fromFor some reason no one seems interested in my reality TV series: DIY Philosophy. It's so full of action and suspense I can't understand why no one will pick it up.Epidsode 1: I brew a pot of hazelnut coffee, feed the cats, sit down at my dining room table, place Deleuze and Guattari's 1000 Plateaus on my lap, pissing off the resident velociraptor who gives me that you're-such-a-loser-when-can-i-eat-you look.Episode 2: I begin reading. I furrow my brow, sip coffee, continue reading. As soon as
This is mind blowing. I don't think I totally understand everything but reading it and imagining what it means is a revelation. It seems to promote a consciousness of the world that is devoid of hierarchy and shatters fundamental categories. I decided to read this intermittently so far I finished chapter 5.
Fucking wow. I read Deleuze for the first time when my sophomore year of college, and found him impenetrable and obnoxious, but now, after falling in love with some people inspired by Deleuze (Edward Soja, Antonio Negri, etc.), I'm back on the bandwagon. Not only does it provide a phenomenal perspective on the world that will help any student of literature, psychology, sociology, anthropology, political science, art, etc., but also is extremely good at curing internal fascist malaise. Lovely!
I am torn on this review and rating. On the one-hand I recognize this as one of the quintessential post-modern tomes up there with Lyotard's Postmodern Condition or Foucault's The Archaeology of Knowledge but on the other hand, the quixotic hubris in this text is almost overbearing. It really depends on how I am looking at the purpose of the writing. If i try to look at it like a true philosophical text with intended insight and description, it falls completely flat. It truly is the inane
i loved reading this -- it was exciting and confrontational and challenged the primacy of psychoanalysis and all sorts of other 20th century "givens." to say that i READ the book is a lie. i read about 50-100 pages of it (the section dealing with the Body without Organs, a plane of being that we all strive towards) and plan of reading further into it.
Introduction: RhizomeWhere does one (/two/several) go from Anti-Oedipus? How does one take further a project constituted by such an extreme rupture? Is it possible? Anti-Oedipus followed the wake of the tumultuous riots of May '68; the breaches were clear, people had had enough; it was not just alienation in the work place, people could no longer stand the image of desire they had been presented with. Perhaps a new world was being fabricated; and yet, the momentum wouldn't last; the breach
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.